US air defense to rebels in Syria, anther Obama reckless move in the Islamic World!

31 Mar

President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin who is President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebFrom the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?From the Fletcher security posts: Is President Obama’s proposal of giving sophisticated anti-aircraft system to the rebels is Syria just another case of poor judgement regarding Muslims?

Dan Goor
“Consultant-Extraordinaire”: PHYSICIST; World-Class INVENTOR of marketable concepts and products; Entrepreneur;
President Obama is planning to send state-of-the-art air defense systems to the rebels in Syria; since Assad is backed by Putin, President Obama’s nemesis, is this not like pouring fuel on a fire?

Hillary Clinton declared Bashar Assad “a true reformer,” and had the United States stand by when the present Syrian rebellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?ellion started.
Time proved Mrs. Clinton wrong, Assad caused well over 100,000 non-combatant deaths, well over five million civilian Syrians to become refugees, and he (Assad) also used chemical weapons on his own people.
The void caused by Secretary Clinton’s decision to keep the United States out of the rebellion, did not only allow Assad to re-group, it allowed the Shiite Iran (with Hezbollah,) and with Russia (their benefactor,) to compel Syria’s Sunni neighbors, the Saudis, to enter the fray in support of the rebels, with the Saudis, however, came al Qaeda.
President Obama is now suggesting to give the rebels, which among other things mean al Qaeda, sophisticated air defense weaponry; who will these weapons be used against?
Without any United States control of said systems, how likely is it that al Qaeda may target United States assets, as well as United States allies, allies such as Israel, and possibly Turkey?
Is United States foreign policy continues to unravel?
Is President Obama so bamboozled, and intimidated by anything Islam that his actions concerning Muslims are irrational? Did President Obama’s Cairo speech to the Islamic World signaled that such behavior should be expected?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: