After numerous clear rejections, Obama still try diplomacy with Iran; is that insanity?

11 Nov

Does it make sense for Obama to soften US stance towards Iran in spite of Khamenei harsh words, to relinquish the leadership role and to let tiny Israel keep the world safe from Iran’s nukes?

On November 4, 2013, Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared the United States: “The most hated country in the world,” and led a demonstration with chants: “Death to America.” Within a week, and a just after being humiliated by Iran in New York, President Obama send Secretary of State Kerry to Geneva to hold talks with the Iranians regarding their nuclear program; how naive can President Obama be?

Albert Einstein defined insanity as: “A state when someone who tried a solution to a problem failed, tries the same solution, to the same problem, but expects different results!” Is this a good description of President Obama dealing with Iran?

Israel is a relatively powerful nation with 7,000,000 people (less than 2% of United States population,), one with infinitesimal landmass. Until recently, when off-shore gas was discovered by Israel, the country was essentially void of natural resources, except for human brain-power, and the technologies said human resource yielded.
Suggesting that Israel take out Iran’s nuclear developments, before the rogue Islamic Republic that Iran is, acquires nuclear weapon capabilities, is a monumental task, with great expectations. Should the “civilized” world agree that Israel be its emissary for whatever is good and civilized, and take out Iran’s nuclear capabilities? If so many difficult conditions will have to be met. Te suggestion here is that: “The tail should wag the dog…” Can it be done?
Any rational scenario for Israel would have to include missile launches from submarines on the Golf, Israel owns quality subs courtesy of Angela Merkel. Having said that, said submarines will have to have clear passage through the Suez Canal, a task that must be done under the present Egyptian regime since a Muslim Brotherhood return to power would not keep this option available.
The Saudis, Jordanians, and other Gulf States, who all fear Iran as much as Israel does, would have to agree to give Israel the right to use their airspace; Iraq’s space, of course, would not be available since Iraq now is a client of Iran.
The United States would have to supply Israel with its most powerful bunker-busting bombs, and in large numbers. The United States, with Gulf States, would have to also be responsible for free Israeli submarines movement in the Gulf.
On top of these conditions, clandestine operation within Iran will have to be coordinated.
Since on November 4, 2013, Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei led a parade in Teheran declaring the United States as the most hated country in the world, he said so without even excepting Israel, his mortal enemy, can anybody accept United States President Obama declaration that US Iranian relations are thawing?
Does any rational person believe that loosening the sanctions on Iran, at this time, as Obama wishes to do makes sense?
About two years ago Israel, during the quite of the night, took-out a nuclear facility in Syria, that task was welcomed by the Western World it only appear on the back pages of newspapers around the world. Israel’s success should not make people be complacent; taking out Iran’s nuclear capability will be costly. Iran WILL retaliate, even if cannot reach Israel, it can take out its anger on the numerous US troops on the Golf, and it will likely hurt those Arab neighbors who allowed Israel in.
A final word. Iran has a “Fatwa,” an irrevocable order by the highest religious authority, an order to: “Not build nuclear weapons.” Since Islam makes allowances for lying when it mean maintaining it version of survival, a term called “Takeyya,” the Ayatollah’s order leaves room for Iran’s completion of its weapon grade Uranium development, material which then to be used on nuclear-weapons technology that it can get from Russia, China, and even possible from North Korea.
President Obama (a person who seems to be intimidated by anything Muslim,) thinks that Iran is softening its posture regarding the US, how can rational people people who witnessed the November 4, 2013 demonstration against the US, find a way to dispute President Obama’s views while he is the titular head of the free world? Obama still controls many of the elements that will be required to take-out Iran nuclear capabilities, how can one make him see the light? Could, or should, this large powerful world count on tiny Israel to do its bidding, and bail it out? Or, should allies unite and convince President Obama that as the “leader of the Free World,” he is the one, the only one, who must take decisive action to keep the world safe from Iranian nuclear weapons!”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: