America’s Capitulator in Chief (C.i.C) strikes again; time for Obama to leave! Or, Capitulation is tantamount to relinquishing control.

15 Dec

Capitulation is tantamount to relinquishing control.

By capitulating to the opposition one give said opposition beneficial control, in a case of a President, it is tantamount to relinquishing control of the country. Why should a country need such a figurehead, why does the United States need Barak Hussein Obama to occupy the White House?

Giving up on the surtax on millionaires, something that 70% of the public supports, as do most millionaires, is a dereliction of duty, it should be enough to ensure a loss for the President in 2012.

Boehner just made it clear that the surtax on millionaires is out; ‘it was not ever seriously considered,’ by the Republicans. If this turn out to be the case, and President Obama capitulates again, it would appear that the man lost all credibility and clearly should not be re-elected!

The Unites States does not need a Capitulator in Chief (C.i.C,) since such person allows the opposition to dictate policy, why does the country need a President who allows the opposition to dictate the way the country governed?

Advertisements

One Response to “America’s Capitulator in Chief (C.i.C) strikes again; time for Obama to leave! Or, Capitulation is tantamount to relinquishing control.”

  1. Elwood Tillett January 9, 2012 at 7:53 am #

    Yeah bookmaking this wasn’t a high risk conclusion outstanding post! .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: