Is President Barack Obama’s foolish and irresponsible interview with Al-Arabia a result of his Muslim-birth, and a bond with Islam that he is finally displaying, or was the selection of Al-Arabia another demonstration that [the Bush] pro-Israel policies are about to change?
To chose Al-Arabia, an openly anti-Israel, anti Zionism, anti-American (at least while allied with Israel), and anti-Jewish, news organization, as the first television channel for an interview, is a slap in the face to many allies of the United States, and to many people who voted Barack Hussein Obama into office.
Since the Obama Administration is so dead-set at destroying everything the was done by the Bush Administration; would Israel turned out to be thae baby that went down with the bathwater; or would Israel lose because it was strongly supported by Bush, or would Israel be sacrificed because of Obama’s Mulim-birth; or could Israel maintain United States support becasue it is the right ting to do? Only time will tell how Israel will fare, so far, however, under the Obama Administration, it has a lot to fear, beyond just fear itself.
The Al-Arabia selection also enhances Iran’s Ahmadinejad position, which suggests that Islam is so powerful that the United States must modify its posture towards this ruthless and primitive religion. Muslims recognized President Obama’s capitulation to the Islamic world as a demonstration of weakness versus Islam. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for example, welcomed and publicly voiced his appreciation of President Obama’s apologies to the Islamic world during his interview with Al-Arabia. Ahmadinejad, however, is insisting that the United States must apologize to Iran separately. Ahmadinejad, who recently demonstrated his global influence by causing* the Christmas war in Gaza, seems to understand that regardless to statements to the contrary, Obama’s Muslim-birth has a great deal to do with who Obama is!
Since most of the Islamic world is made up of Semites, and because Iran is an Aryan nation, one can sympathize with Ahmadinejad demand, providing one believes that the United States did indeed wrong the Islamic world, which it did not!
President Obama may be very popular in the United States; his recent actions demonstrate that political expediency is more important to Obama than are earlier commitments and loyalties. Examples of Obama’s flighty nature are the cases of the Reverend Wright, and of Mr. Ayers who are but two close associates that Obama threw under the bus because they appeared to represent political liabilities.
After months of insisting that he is not, and never was a Muslim, Barack Obama finally came out of the closet and used his Muslim name, Hussein, when he was sworn in. By Shariya (Islamic law) once a Muslim always a Muslim, The Koran does not have provisions for a Muslim to convert out of Islam; to the contrary, whoever convert out of the religion receives an immediate death sentence. Technically, Barack Hussein Obama is under a Shariya death sentence since he was born a Muslim and later converted to Christianity.
President Obama’s selection of Al-Arabia as the outlet for his first television interview does not seem to appear as an innocent though poor, choice, the selection seems to be the beginning of a dangerous trend, a precedence setting event that may signal a shift in US policies under Obama to an approach to the world that may strengthen Islam and move it forward toward the world domination that is predicted by the Koran.
President George W. Bush was not a popular President, but he did work at keeping the United States safe from those who would like to destroy it. Obama is moving away from the Bush approach to terrorism while giving openings to [Islamic] terrorists who are waiting for an opportunity to inflict as much damage on the United States as possible. We must all hope that Obama misguided ties to Islam will not come home to roost, or that the Islamic world does not take advantage of Obama’s soft spot regarding his Muslim-birth.
*Ahmadinejad started the recent conflict in Gaza by getting his surrogate, Hammas, to terminate a cease-fire with Israel and lob numerous rockets into Southern Israel on Christmas Eve. Note that the timing was selected to start on the Christian Holiday, and would have to stop on the United States Presidential inauguration, since Israel would not dare destroy that special day for the new President.