Cable television political advocates, not news channels!
Posted: February 22, 2012 Filed under: Call a spade a spade Fox News and MSNBC are political not news operations, Uncategorized | Tags: MSNBC and Fox are de facto PAC's 2 Comments »Call a spade a spade: Fox News & MSNBC are Political not news operations!
Since most personalities on MSNBC are supporters of Barak Hussein Obama for President of the United States, it would be appropriate to consider the channel a Political Action Committee outlet, not a news channel. This is particularly true because three key “pundits” on MSNBC are blind and unwavering backer of the President!
Rachel Maddow, Larry O’Donnell, and Ed Shultz devote nearly all their air times to discrediting all potential GOP Presidential candidates, while trying to boost Barak Obama’s record, and promote his re-election.
These three, millionaires on their own, claim that unlike Republican politicians and media pundits who are pro the wealthy, they, the MSNBC bunch, understand and speak for the middle class. The MSNBC trio is so dedicated to get Barak Obama re-elected that they would say anything, regardless of how true or false it maybe, in support of the President.
It is true that FOX News is also a political channel and should not be referred to as a news channel, but in the case of Fox they are in process of determining who the GOP candidate is likely to be, before giving total support to that person. Until that happens, Fox is simply knocking down President Obama.
As things stand it is clearly a misnomer to call either MSNBC, or Fox, news channel, both are, and should be identified as political action operations.
Santorum would combine State and Church! A “neuvo Empror?”
Posted: February 20, 2012 Filed under: As "President" Santorum combine State and Church | Tags: Santorum for Emperor? Leave a comment »There are four GOP persons still officially attempting to capture the position of the 2012 Republican Presidential candidate; only one of the four men, Rick Santorum, is actually running for Emperor. Santorum, should he be elected President, will head the Church, as well as the State; as head of Church, Santorum would be responsible for determining the morality of all individual Americans.
The fact that the founding fathers desired separation between State and Church, notwithstanding, a Santorum Presidency would combine the two under the ex Pennsylvania Congressman; is that what the people of the United States want?
“Syria is Burning!” Al-Zawahri (al-Queda) trumps Obama; another win for Ahmadinejad?
Posted: February 12, 2012 Filed under: With Syria burning is al-Queda out-maneuvering the US ? | Tags: Is al-Queda trumping the US in Syria Leave a comment »“Syria is Burning,” it is burning with flames that could mean freedom, but that may turn the country into another Sharia ruled piece of the Middle East puzzle.
Syria, a country with impressive history, and with advanced culture could have become a small democratic island in the Arab world, should its rebels received support from the West, or rather from some US led coalition, but the United States chose to stand by while Syria is burning…
Up to a point the US stood behind Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt, all primitive nations that will be adopting Sharia law, and turning against the United States and its allies. Syria, the cultural entity in the region, a country that could have become a stepping-stone for democracy in the Middle East, is being neglected by the United States as part of its totally inept foreign policy.
Al-Queda’s chief al-Zawahri is now calling for his people to support the Syrian revolt so that he and his organization can gain influence in the region. Since under Assad Syria was the pipeline between Iran, Hizbollah, and Hamas, a Syria under al-Queda’s influence will strengthen these organizations, and weaken Israel’s defensive position, and the Arab Gulf states.
As things stand, Iran would be pleased to have Assad, on of its more reliable clients, remain in power. But, if the removal of Assad were inevitable, then an Islamic country under Sharia law, and with al-Queda presence, would be a welcomed option.
United States inaction in Syria created an opening for al-Queda, and is serving as another demonstration of a frightfully inept American foreign policy in the region. It may not be too late for the United States Administration to follow Senator McCain’s advice and find means to help the Syrian rebels while gaining some much-needed influence in the region.
Shared with: www.zyonism.org
Stake in ground for 2012 US/Israel Iran action! Only Iran capitulation can stop it.
Posted: February 11, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: 2012 US action will stop Iran nukes Leave a comment »US/Israel, inevitable 2012 Iran action; preparing the “bunker-busters!” The stake is in the ground, and only Iran can stop it now.
Military’s request for funds to ready twenty of its “bunker-busting,” bombs, some for its own supply, some to upgrade those in the hands of the Israelis is an early signal of inevitable action against Iran’s nuclear facilities. Since the critical Iranian facilities are deep underground, the bunker-busters will be a weapon of choice, perhaps accompanied by a number of tactical nukes from both the US and Israeli arsenals.
US and Israeli strategies are likely to include missiles from the Persian Gulf, air from US bases in Gulf States, and likely flight from Israel over Jordanian and Saudi air space. Even if the United States may play a support role because of political issues in an election year, its initial request for $91,000,000.00 for bunker-buster preparation, is but a first step in inclusion of the Congress in action that will likely take place before the 2012 election. The inevitable action is at a stage now that only action by Iran can stop its inevitability, and Iran will have to open up all its facilities, stop its enrichment program, and allow for permanent inspectors in all its facilities.
Since the US left Iraq, and Israel will not have that airspace available as a route to Iran, and as Egypt’s new rulers will not likely let Israel use the Suez, as did Mubarak, the US role in a mission to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities has been expended, including the use of UA resources now in the Gulf.
Count on the 2012 US election to shift emphasis from the economy and social issues, and to energy from the Gulf States, and the inevitable action against Iran.
Voting Santorum encourages a Religion-based [United] State!
Posted: February 7, 2012 Filed under: A vote for Santorum rncourages oppression and a relgion-based state | Tags: Santorum represents relgion-based state 1 Comment »Voting Santorum encourages a Religion-based [United] State!
Ex-Senator Santorum who was rejected by the people of his own state, lost his last election by a resounding 18% is a man who being evolves around his religion, a man who can in no way separate his religion from state business if he was in a position to conduct such business.
The young ex-Senator from Pennsylvania believes strongly in his Catholic religion, and should he be in a position to dictate to the country what rule it should follow, he could not separate his religious beliefs from the civil needs of the state.
Electing Santorum, a well-meaning Catholic, would be tantamount to creating a religion-based country, not something the United States can tolerate.
PAC $$$, Obama’s Capitulation: Remaining in character! America’s Capitulator in Chief (C.i.C.) strikes again…
Posted: February 7, 2012 Filed under: Obama capitulates again this time money over principal | Tags: Obama capitulating to PAC $$$ 3 Comments »To borrow from the “West Wing,” but remain in the real world: President is all about character! Trading principle for political expediency is a clear demonstration of lacking character; President, Barak Hussein Obama is perhaps one of the most blatant capitulator who ever participated in American politics.
Until now Obama gave in when it came to dealing with legislation that he wanted to pass in the face of a Republican House of Representatives. Obama sacrificed the public option in his health care bill, gave up on an extended debt ceiling, and on the extension of the Bush tax cut for the rich, the President put forth a proposal for surtax on millionaires and gave it up as just another demonstration of how he seldom stands behind his principal.
Now, after years of objecting to unlimited funding for political election, President Obama capitulated, keep alive his title of America’s: Capitulator in Chief (C.i.C.) a title he is likely to keep for as long as he remains President, or just a politician.
Syria important link to MidEast peace; why is US on sidelines?
Posted: February 4, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Why is US on sidelines when Syria is burning Leave a comment »Recently, the United States and its allies supported revolts in Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt; all three are in the process to adopt Sharia law, and distant themselves from the West. From the “free world,” if you will. Some short-term results of these actions include riots in Egypt, and the likelihood that it would terminate its peace agreement with Israel, while essentially turn it back on the United States. Egypt is not the Egypt of old with ancestors who contributed a great deal to world culture; Egypt is an Arab country with nomads’ roots.
Libya and Tunisia are tribal countries, backwards and ready to adopt strong Sharia law, and an environment similar to what the Taliban had…
On the other hand, Syria, a country who contributed a great deal to world civilization, is allowed, “to burn” by a ruthless dictator, the son of another dictator. Syria with a significant intelligentsia, and impressive history could become the key to unlocking the door to Middle East peace.
Neither the Chinese, nor the Russians are concerned about civility, or civil rights, in the case of Syria both countries are interested in economic gains. The United States tried to pass a Security Council Resolution to curb Assad, to only be confronted by vetoes from the Russia, and Chinese. Even though the United States is not the world policeman, nor the guardian of freedom, as the only “super power” and a Judeo/Christian country with moral obligation to all people, getting involved in Syria may be inevitable.
Supporting Syria’s move towards freedom and democracy should not be viewed as an option; it should be accepted as an obligation, and take place without much additional delay. Among other things, a democratic Syria is likely to be the foundation of MidEast civility.
Israel’s window-of-opportunity to take-out Iran’s nuke shrinking!
Posted: January 30, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Time-table to imminent action against Iran narrowing Leave a comment »Imminent action to eliminate, or at least curtail, Iran’s nuclear activity, is in the offing. If the United States, its allies, as supported by the [Arab] Gulf States who fear Ahmadinejad’s Iran, leaves the actual action to Israel, one can count on something to happen very soon. The US leaving Iraq’s airspace under Iraq’s control, and the Islamic Brotherhood in process of taking control of Egypt and the Suez Canal, Israel is realizing that its window of opportunity is narrowing.
Additionally, the fact that this is an election year in the United States; Israel must act itself if any American President could be in a position to take the necessary action against Iran. As supportive as President Obama has been to Israel, and tough words from Secretary Pennetta about Iran’s nukes, Israel cannot be certain that another Obama Administration could deal more effectively with Iran. Adding all the facts that relate to Iran’s looming nuclear threat, Israel may be forced to move in the very near future.
Also, as cynical as this may sound, Israel, and the “free world,” must decide if its future should be left in the hands of the United States with Obama as President, or if it makes sense to wait and hope for a Republican Administration that will very likely more aggressive in dealing with Iran.
With Mubarak out of the way, the Islamic Brotherhood gaining control, and the looming Sharia law in Egypt, using the Suez Canal on the way to the Persian/Arabian Gulf may not be an option still available to Israel. The United States withdrawal from Iraq may complicate the air route that Israel may need to follow to get to Iran, when the time comes.
Since the Saudis and other Gulf states are as fearful of a nuclear Iran as is Israel, Israel already has a tacit approval to use that airspace on the way to Iran, Israel is left with two, rather than the three options they had before Egypt’s ouster of Mubarak. When Mubarak was in power Israel did use the Suez Canal to send a number of submarines to the Gulf, in order to test the options of using missiles, and perhaps in some areas actual the landing of special troops.
Israel’s options presently include air, and covert land activity; it may also use its special troops, if conditions dictate. The facts that options are reduced, and Iran is getting closer, and closer to getting enriched Uranium, Israel’s window of opportunity is narrowing, imminent action against Iran’s nukes is now likely to happen sooner, rather than later.
Shared with: www.zyonism.org
Would you buy a used car from Newt Gingrich?
Posted: January 22, 2012 Filed under: Gingrich a manipulator of facts would you buy a used car from the ex-Speaker? | Tags: Would you buy a used car from Newt Gingrich Leave a comment »Befor you vote, or answer poles about a candidate, you should ask youself : Would I buy a used car fro that person?
I would have no problems buying a used car from three of the four GOP candidates still in the race; I would not buy one from Newt Gingrich.
Newt Gingrich is a very smart man, perhaps too smart to be President of the United States. In the debate during which he was asked about the ABC interview with his second wife. Mr. Gingrich showed how quick, intelligent, but unscrupulous, he is; the ex-Speaker ignores the facts and attacked the media, the carrier of bad news, if you will. The crowds loved him and cheered, but the fact remains, he ignored facts, changed the subject, and made it appear that those who informed the public of the events of which he was guilty, were the culprits, removing the burden from him.
Newt Gingrich habitually twists fact to suit his purpose. His ethics situation at the House of Representatives was a case in point. The ex-Speaker convened the IRS that classes he gave were educational, when in reality they were very partisan, and should have been taxes as a political effort.
Would you buy a use car from Newt Gingrich? I would not!
Gingrich ethics violations: His words don’t count!
Posted: January 22, 2012 Filed under: Gingrich's words about ethics violation don't cut it formal data must be provided!, Uncategorized | Tags: Gingrich cannot be trusted to dispute ethic charges Leave a comment »Gingrich ethics violations: His words don’t count!
His income and source of most of his income suggest that the ex-Speaker is a lobbyist; no historian, who he claims to be would be paid millions from an entity involved in real estate. Mr. Gingrich often speaks words that do not seem to be consistent with facts. The issue of his ethics violations is a case in point. I heard some of the ex-Speaker classes; his claim that they were non-partisan is clearly false; the IRS should have classified them as political, and treated in that manner.
Words from the ex-Speaker about his ethics violations are not going to clean the slate! Unless Mr. Gingrich’s words are accompanied with a release of all formal documentation associated with the hearings, and a formal release of those involved in the investigation of their confidentiality obligations, the ex-Speaker will, as he should, remain guilty in the eyes of the public. Mr. Gingrich, a very ambitious man, would not have resigned his seat in the House of Representatives if there were no fire behind the ethics violations smoke.
The only way Mr. Gingrich can clean the slate is by allowing Pelosi, and all other involved in the investigation to speak about it without violation any confidentiality obligations, while at the same time release all formal documents related to that investigation. Where there is smoke there is fire!
Mr. Gingrich would not have resigned his position in the House if he did not do anything wrong! If the ex-Speaker wishes to be elected to the highest office in the land, the least he can do is come clean and allow the public to know who he really is!