I would have no problems buying a used car from three of the four GOP candidates still in the race; I would not buy one from Newt Gingrich.

Newt Gingrich is a very smart man, perhaps too smart to be President of the United States. In the debate during which he was asked about the ABC interview with his second wife. Mr. Gingrich showed how quick, intelligent, but unscrupulous, he is; the ex-Speaker ignores the facts and attacked the media, the carrier of bad news, if you will. The crowds loved him and cheered, but the fact remains, he ignored facts, changed the subject, and made it appear that those who informed the public of the events of which he was guilty, were the culprits, removing the burden from him.

Newt Gingrich habitually twists fact to suit his purpose. His ethics situation at the House of Representatives was a case in point. The ex-Speaker convened the IRS that classes he gave were educational, when in reality they were very partisan, and should have been taxes as a political effort.

Would you buy a use car from Newt Gingrich? I would not!

His income and source of most of his income suggest that the ex-Speaker is a lobbyist; no historian, who he claims to be would be paid millions from an entity involved in real estate. Mr. Gingrich often speaks words that do not seem to be consistent with facts. The issue of his ethics violations is a case in point. I heard some of the ex-Speaker classes; his claim that they were non-partisan is clearly false; the IRS should have classified them as political, and treated in that manner.

Words from the ex-Speaker about his ethics violations are not going to clean the slate! Unless Mr. Gingrich’s words are accompanied with a release of all formal documentation associated with the hearings, and a formal release of those involved in the investigation of their confidentiality obligations, the ex-Speaker will, as he should, remain guilty in the eyes of the public. Mr. Gingrich, a very ambitious man, would not have resigned his seat in the House of Representatives if there were no fire behind the ethics violations smoke.

The only way Mr. Gingrich can clean the slate is by allowing Pelosi, and all other involved in the investigation to speak about it without violation any confidentiality obligations, while at the same time release all formal documents related to that investigation. Where there is smoke there is fire!

Mr. Gingrich would not have resigned his position in the House if he did not do anything wrong! If the ex-Speaker wishes to be elected to the highest office in the land, the least he can do is come clean and allow the public to know who he really is!

Even though the quitting-Governor lady of Alaska is totally unqualified for the job of President, she has shown excellent political judgment. She knew that she could not be competitive in the debates (her voice, if nothing else,) semi endorsed Gingrich so he “owes” her, and is keeping her name in front of the public, just enough, not to be destroyed by the primary process.

Just like Romney’s bet: $—-.00 on: A 2012 Palin/Gingrich GOP ticket!

If there ever was a mismatch between behavior and belief, the United States’ ex-Speaker of the House of Representatives, Newt Gingrich, is a great example of such situation.

If, as the pundits predict, Mr. Gingrich does well with the evangelistic people of South Carolina, one could easily lose respect for those who put, what they must perceive to be expedience, ahead of religious conviction.

Ex-Speaker Gingrich converted to Catholicism after his two major infidelities, and he asked forgiveness, he repented…But, after two failed marriages, and being found guilty of ethics violation at the House of Representatives, does it appear as if the Speaker’s character make him suitable for the highest office of the United States?

Ex-Speaker Gingrich is a smart person, but the man is clearly an opportunist who puts his own personal interests at the forefront of everything in his life; is that the kind of man the United States wants to be its President? I think not!

To Gingrich: If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen!

Newt Gingrich says that it is too difficult to manage where the media can be dig into one’s personal life. Gingrich leaves out the fact personal life is a measure of character, and character is the most important trait a President must possess.

The ex-Speaker, Newt Gingrich, takes liberties with facts, as well as with morality in order to make his case. The ex-Speaker is willing to sacrifice morality and good behavior for votes. For example, in South Carolina with 28% African-American population the ex-Speaker feels free to say things that are offensive to that minority, things that he would never dare use in the general election, should he become the GOP nominee.

Nick Santorum gave a good view of the ex-Speaker: A man with grandiose ideas, but without the discipline, character, or ability to deal with details, to carry out any of his ideas.

The Republicans would make a major mistake if they select Newt Gingrich to be their Presidential candidate. Such selection would give the GOP a black eye that would require many years to overcome!

He received $1.6 million from Freddie Mac and Fannie may for advice as a historian, when his knowledge as a historian has to be with Belgian policy in Africa, a very relevant bit of knowledge on United States real-estate business.

The ex-Speaker of the United States, Newt Gingrich attempts to present himself as an intellectual with academic credentials when in reality the ex-Speaker is simply a professional politician.

Mr. Gingrich continues to claim that he speaks, as a historian when in reality the ex-Speaker is a politician. In order to impress his audiences and appear academician, Mr. Gingrich love to employ the term model on every turn; the ex-Speaker seems to feel that such term would separate him from his adversaries who do not appear to have experience in [computer] modeling.

Newt Gingrich dismisses the fact that he was paid as a lobbyist, the ex-Speaker does so based on a technicality, he was not registered as a lobbyist, and all lobbyist are supposed to be registered. What Gingrich overlooks is the fact that the large pay he was receiving was due to his contacts and influence in Washington, not based on his knowledge of the Belgian policies in Africa.

Newt Gingrich is a politician who tried to pass himself as an intellectual with academic background, the ploy will not succeed…

Act 3:16 And his name through faith in his name hath made this man strong, whom ye see and know; yea, the faith which is by him hath given him his perfect soundness in the presence of you all.

Paraphrased:

And Tebow through his name hath made this man Tebow strong, whom ye see and know; yea, the faith whuch is by him hath given Tebow his perfect soundness in the presence of [either] you all; or, you Broco fans.

Just think 2012 GOP nominees:

 Palin with Gingrich

With help from ex-Speaker Gingrich all present potential nominees will continue to destroy each other! The quitter-Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin,  is waiting in the wings, not exposing herself to debates. When the present potential candidates demolish each other, the lady from Alaska will offer to sacrifice herself for the nation.

When the time comes the quitter-Governor will likely get a divine message to offer herself to the nation, she will capitulate and agree to be the Republican Presidential nominee.

As to Gingrich, Todd Palin, or “the first dude,” as MS Palin calls her husband, already more-or-less offered Gingrich the opportunity to be the running mate, by “endorsing” the ex-Speaker.

Since Venture Capital (VC) is an important fuel in the engine of Capitalism, a generally efficient fuel that have driven the booming United States economy starting in the early 1950′s, (and is still going strong,) politicians, just to suit their personal objectives, should not dismiss its value.

The fact that in the last fifty year (or a little more,) glitches appeared in the economy, has little to do with VC’s, but rather much to do with traditional and very greedy banking institutions, and gluttonous politicians. For Rick Perry to refer Venture Capital, as “vulture capital” is another demonstration of the man’s lack of knowledge and common sense.

Microsoft, Apple Computers, Staples (a “product” of Bain,) HP (made up of a number of VC products such as DEC,) are but a few example of VC’s contribution to America’s economy. For Gingrich and Perry to dismiss the value of Venture Capital and relegate it to an “anti-society,” element, is ignorant and actually stupid; it is contrary to the foundation of their party, the Republican Party!

This blog was not designed to support Mitt Romney, even though he does deserve credit for his work at Bain, the Olympics, and Massachusetts, but it was rather designed to suggest that by attacking the principles of their own party, candidates are giving ammunition to the opposition to use during the coming general election. Ex-Speaker Gingrich, the historian, should know better; Governor Perry may be simply too ignorant and unaware of the damage he is causing his own party. All that notwithstanding, it is time for Republicans to understand the foundation of their own party and protect it from the onslaught that will start in a few months during the general election.