Did Obama’s reluctance to confront Islam result in squandering an opportunity of “neutralizing” Iran?

Did Obama’s reluctance to confront Islam result in squandering an opportunity of neutralizing Iran?

President Obama may not even be aware of the fact that his Islamic roots, instincts, and sympathies, those elements that constitute his soul, keep him from confronting Islam, but he clearly does!

In the case of Iran, President Obama decision to act objective and let the Iranian peoplechoose, was ill conceived, and poorly executed. There is little or no doubt that the Iranian elections were flawed. Not even sophisticated counting equipment could have declared a winner in an election with 50 million votes, as did the Iranians. The protest that followed should support that notion, the Iranian elections were rigged, and other nations should have officially objected to the results.

President Obama’s relatively mild rhetoric’s about the election gave Ahmadinejad an opening to criticize the young American President, call him inexperienced, and object to his meddling in Iran’s affairs. Obama not insisting on at a minimum of an objective international review of Iran’s election results, and at least an official hintof US holding back recognition of the newly elected government, did strengthened Ahmadinejad, and, of course, weakened Obama who cannot be viewed as leader of the free world with his mellow tone, and inaction.

Not being inside of Obama;s head no one but President Obama, and perhaps not even the President, can tell how much of his behavior is due to his Islamic soul. No one can tell with any level of certainty, if you will. Does Obama’s Muslim should represent a chinc in his arm, a weakness in his ability to govern the United States in a effective manner while Islamic forces are out to hurt the country?


Obama blinks: Iran can have nuke [power...]; Israel will be forced to be “the tail that wags the dog,” and take out Iran’s Nuclear works.

President Barak Hussein Obama’s Islamic roots, instincts and sympathies continue to surface.

Ahmadinejad a shrewed little man with likely Jewish roots and intellect, keeps holding his ground, while Obama with his great desire to build a legacy of a statesman (which he has not proven to be,) is retreating. President Obama has now proven to be the kind of person to whom loyalties  take a back-seat to personal ambition.

Examples of Obama’s convenient loyalties include: Jeramya Wright, the man who introduced him to Christianity, and than for many years was his mentor; Bill Ayers, a friend, and Louis Farrakahn, an associates, people who he through under the bas, people who were not even invited to his innoguration…

Now, when loyalties do count, Obama is in the process of increasing the chasm between Israel and the United States by capitulating to Iran, and by visiting the Middle Eastern Islamic states while skipping Israel; the only trust ally that the United States has in the region, the only democracy in the Middle East.

The sacrifice of Israel by Obama seems to be irreversible, even though he may be snubbed by the Middle East Islamic states. Even though with his Islamic birthrights, instincts, and sympathies, Obama thinks that Muslims will revere and accept him, he is an infidel and a mortal sinner by publically denying his Islam. A person cannot discard his roots, but denying them, as Obama usually does, more often than not bring dire circumstances, which President Obama is about to encounter.

The charismatic, energetic, and super orator that Obama is, his lack of loyalties, arrogance, and ability to discard past commitments in favor speculative future, and personal gains.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.