Limbaugh’s Politicizing and minimizing the threat of swine-flu; the epitome of irresponsibility:
Posted: May 2, 2009 Filed under: Limbaugh, Limbaugh's fantasies a disgrace, no credit to GOP, or conservatives | Tags: a disgrace, Limbaugh's fantasies Leave a comment »Politicizing the swine-flu, a sample of Limbaugh disgraceful and irresponsible behavior:
Limbaugh after repeating the fact that he is 91.1% correct explained to his audience that, while the global community was entering a state of panic: The swine flu pandemic is Democrat fabrication designed to divert attention from Obama’s lackluster first 100 days!
The man who speaks for the United States conservatives, the man who claims to nearly never be wrong, insulted those members of the global community who have a level of intelligence beyond that of the herd of sheep that is his (Limbaugh’s) audience.
Limbaugh is a druggy, shaking as he was at the CPAC convention while wishing that Obama should fail. Limbaugh’ ego is either so big, or his insecurities so enormous, that by making outrageous statements he thinks his poor academic history, his highly immoral life, and low level of intelligence, can be hidden; they cannot!
Rush Limbaugh is a disgrace to conservatism (that he claims to represent,) to the GOP, and more importantly, to the United States. When will Limbaugh learn to either shut-up, or start dealing with realities, and not with his drug generated fantasies!
Rush Limbaugh’s anti-Semitic/Jewish reference to the Jewish Shylock as a representation of dishonest money lenders, what a shameful view!
Posted: April 28, 2009 Filed under: a conservative trend?, Coulter anti-Jewish statements; a new trend?, Limbaugh, Limbaugh anti-Jewish views | Tags: an anti-Jewish trend?, Conservative voices, Coulter, Limbaugh Leave a comment »Rush Limbaugh’s anti-Semitic/Jewish reference to the Jewish Shylock as a representation of dishonest money lenders, is a shameful perspective!
On his radio show Rush Limbaugh referred to an Obama mortgage web effort as the Shylock web. Since Shylock was a Shakespearean unscrupulous Jewish-money lender, Limbaugh’s reference is a clear and damning statement regarding the Jewish character.
Inasmuch as Arabs are also Semites, the Limbaugh condemnation is not actually anti-Semitic, it is rather simply: Anti-Jewish.
For perhaps the most influential conservative spokes person in the United States, Rush Limbaugh, to refer to crooked money sources as Shylocks; is, in a word, much like a statement made by another important conservative voice, Ann Coulter, who suggested that Jews should become Christians in order to be all they can be, is shameful!
These are embarrassing statements by those who, among other things, represent the religious right, they are especially damning in view of the fact that perhaps the most accomplished person in history, the one who impacted the world more than any other person, was a Jewish Rabbi by the name of Yeshua bar Yosef (more commonly referred to as Jesus Christ.)
Based on anti-Semitic/Jewish statements by two leading conservative voices, can, or should, one assume that the United States conservatives are anti-Jewish? Or, should one realize that Coulter and Limbaugh are sensationalists who often shoot-from-the-hip just to get attention?
Limbaugh: Laughing at his audience and at the Public!
Posted: March 7, 2009 Filed under: Limbaugh, Limbaugh and the Emperor's new clothing, Limbaugh let the country go with Obama's economy, Limbaugh ridiculing his audience | Tags: comedian limbaugh, limbaugh's emperor's clothing Leave a comment »Rush Limbaugh always seemed to deal with his audience, and with the American public, as if they are inferior to him, and as if they are designated targets for ridicule by him. Limbaugh’s television show, that did not last long, showed to [television] viewers how his live audience appeared to be like cows led to slaughter, like the crowd that watched the Emperor display his new clothing.
There is little doubt that the Limbaugh television show was dropped because seeing his live audience, TV viewers can see Limbaugh’s disregard to the intelligence of his audience, and, of course, of the American Public in general.
Keith Oberman of MSNBC, not necessarily a great visionary, but a man with some reasonable insight, refers to Rush Limbaugh as Comedian Limbaugh, when will the United States public wake up an realize that Rush Limbaugh is not someone to be taken seriously? Limbaugh, with or without intent, is indeed a comedian, and should be dealt as one by all his viewers!
Colter and Limbaugh: Anything for attention! Or, The Emperor’s New Clothing
Posted: March 7, 2009 Filed under: Colter, Emperor's clothing and Colter/Limbaugh, Limbaugh, Limbaugh and Colter, Limbaugh let the country go with Obama's economy | Tags: Conservatism and the Emperor's new clothing, Limbuag and Colter Leave a comment »Two of the most vocal spokespersons for conservatism and the Republican cause are Limbaugh and Colter, the former appears to nearly always be under the influence of drugs, the latter hiding enormous insecurities; would say anything, the more outrageous, the better! They do so just to get attention.
The American public and the media would be best served by ignoring these two maniacs, the Republican should openly, and as Steele tried and failed, formally, disavow them as representatives of Republicanism!
Colter in Limbaugh use the type of human insecurity that was displayed in the Emperor’s new clothing; the public generally realizes the ridiculous statements made by Limbaugh and Colter, but is generally afraid to be ridiculed as Michael Steele did when he attempted to counter Limbauh.
A Republican meltdown: Sensationalism; the Cheney, Limbaugh, Coulter, factor!
Posted: February 5, 2009 Filed under: a positive step, Chaney naysayers, Colter, Limbaugh, Republican sensationalism, Steele Leave a comment »The selection of Michael Steele to head the Republican party was a stroke of genius; he is a good man and should have a positive impact on the party. The fact that the likes of David Duke are against the selection, speaks well for the appointment.
While selecting what appears to be a credible leader, a number of prominent Republican voices added to the disgrace the party suffered in the 2008 election. From Rush Limbaugh hoping that President Obama fails, to Ann Coulter who continue to make outlandish statement so that she can sell books and appear on television as often as she can, to former Vice President Cheney who says that the Obama Administration cannot keep a catastrophic terrorist attack from happening in the United.
Cheney’s statement demonstrate the character of a cunning, vindictive, and dangerous old man. Cheney realizes that if no attack takes place, his words would simply be forgotten, but if an attack does occur he would become the wise man with uncanny foresight.
Fot the Republican party to return to the graces of most of the American public, it would be wise to distance itself from the like of Limbaugh, Coulter, Cheney, and those others who sensationalize politics in order to get attention.
Steele could have been a good voice for the party, of special importance is his skin color, at a time when Republicans would like to shed off the label of elusiveness. But to the disappointment of many, after suggesting that Limbaugh is only and actor, not one speaking for the party, Steele stooped low and apologized to Limbaugh; what a gutless wonder, what another disgrace.