Calling a spade a spade: More people killed in the name of religion than for any other reason. The Holocaust, and Islamic Jihad, two leading offenders!
Posted: October 7, 2008 Filed under: debate & financial responsibility, Israel "taking out" Iran's nukes with its own arsenal!, Obama's Islamic sympatheies and weakening US/Israel relations, Obama's Sacrificing alliances is an alarming trend, Profiling Muslim to protect majority a must, Realizing that Islam is violent but accepting that not a Muslims are, Strict aderence to Koran requires violence but most Muslims compromise, The right of the many supercedes that of the few Muslim and profiling, The unconventional politically unaffiliated blog | Tags: again population, dysfunctional economy, Financial bailout; dysfunctional economy, goverment failure, hearing, Islam is not peaceful but Muslims can be!, Profiling Muslims a must, Profiling to protect population at large OK, television, The unconventional politically unaffiliated blog 1 Comment »This blog is intended to dispel notions that religions are peaceful, and that in order to be “politically correct,” one must not offend believers.
Attention will be given to United States politics versus that of others, and a discussion of how the present Administration is dealing with friends, and with foes, will take place. With a critical eye, discussion of the Administration “political correctness,” and its blind-eye to violent Islam (and that of other religions,) will be pursued.
An examination of the need to maintain the quality of life of as much of the American public as possible (even at the expense of some minorities,) in face of terrorist threats to the United States, will take place. The premise that “the good of the many supersedes that of the few,” will be examined in face of the fact that Muslims should be “profiled” based on the role members of their Islamic faith play in most of today’s terrorist acts around the word.
The view of this blog is that “profiling” can be done with care, and without causing undue indignities to those being “profiled.” Those “profiled” can be made to understand that the act is not against them individually, but that it is rather because they happen to be members of a group that endanger others. Israel is a case in point. Israeli security screeners seem to go to great length not to offend those Muslims that they “profile;” there is no reason why American “profilers” cannot do the same.
Finally, American foreign policy will be reviewed, especially as it relates to the Middle East, to United States and the Islamic World, and to its relations with “friends and foes,” alike. Special attention will be given to the United States failure to reduce threats from the likes of North Korea, and Iran…
__________________________________________________________________
UPDATE, March 19, 2010
Jerusalem, Israel’s Capital in Perpetuity
Obama Orator extraordinaire, poor communicator
—-See archives March and February
FOLLOWING IS A PARTIAL LIST OF PUBLICATIONS TO DATE (01/18/2010); please visit “archives,” start with the most recent post (January,) and others will follow in sequence:
OVERVIEW:
Calling a spade a spade: More people killed in the name of religion…
About Dangoor (Dan Goor)
dscf1562a
All of Jerusalem is Israel’s via Divine…
“Divine” obstacles may well dismantle 2-state…
Israel has no occupied land…
Neither pure socialism, nor pure capitalism…
The Koran is Islam’s declaration of war…
OBAMA’S PRESIDENCY
Al-Arabia: Obama’s Islamic roots emerging…
Al-Arabia interview: No apologies for the US…
Obama’s Iran appeasement; a systematic…
Notwithstanding questionable performance…
Obama’s fast-track to worst ever US President…
Ode to Obama: Kudos, from [just] a great…
MUSLIMS PROFILING
Should the Ft. Hood massacre be…
Profiling Muslims versus Civil-rights…
Time to formally profile Muslims! Time…
Is Obama trying to “whitewash” the Ft. Hood…
Obama irrational with Muslims: Example…
Statistics support Muslim profiling…
ISRAEL, IRAN, & OBAMA
Deadline for Israel take-out of Iran’s nukes…
Will Obama shoot down Israeli planes over Iraq…
Will Obama order US forces to shoot down Israeli…
Obama’s Hanukkah, a blatant anti-Jewish…
Anti-Jewish versus anti-Semitic; Obama’s…
Is your enemy’s enemy your friend? Hosni Mubarak…
Your friends’ enemies are your enemies!
Obama: An enemy Israel does not need!
THE MEDIA
“Political-media,” altruisticly called: “News Media”…
Rove and Morris, the epitome of losers…
Rush Limbaugh’s anti-Semitic/Jewish reference…
Glenn Beck, a Limbaugh wannabe, an actor…
Limbaugh’s, versus the factual, truths…
Limbaugh: Drown the baby (America’s…
Coulter and Limbaugh: Anything for attention…
Inflexibility of most US political [media...
Reverse racism, was Limbaugh right? The...
Fox News versus the Obama Administration...
OBAMA THE PERSON
Obama: The arrogance of power! His self...
The "Cultural-Islamization," under Obama...
Obama's "cultural Islamization" of the US...
OBAMA'S AFGHANISTAN, & OTHER MILITARY
Obama's Afghanistan actions exonerated Bush...
Obama must relieve McChrystal, or send...
Scenario: 100000+ Allies troops for Afghanistan...
Not able to secure allies support, Afghanistan...
Now that Gates agrees: 100,000+ troops...
Afghanistan: A new Iraq? The case for overwhelming...
Obama's Afghanistan: Is it deja vu? Obama...
More troops to Afghanistan versus Nobel
Obama: "The" [world] expert on missile defence…
Obama’s scrapping Europe missile defense…
Obama’s “Change:” The most political White House…
Obama’s monumental blunder: 25% less troops…
OBAMA’S “HONORS”
Arafat and Obama; Nobel and other common…
Obama’s Nobel selection: Another anti-Jewish…
Obama, the Nobel [Peace Prize] “Sham!”
“Person of the Year;” Why?
THE ECONOMY
Stimulus must be based on “buy American”…
The “bailouts” crime…
Obama’s “infrastructure” infusion; DOA…
Dubai: Tip of the iceberg, a sign of…
US economy must return to product-based…
As lacking as it is, Stimulus deserves…
Obama’s Productless Economic Plan is Doomed…
OBAMA’S HEALTHCARE
Obama’s Healthcare bill: “Daley style” politics…
Health care and the Peter Principle;
Obama’s health plan address, a bad idea!
Obama: Not a visionary!
Obama: The stereotype Chicago Politician!
Obama’s Healthcare speech: Another Clinton…
Palin’s “death squads” claim is false, but…
MISC.
In spite of Jews in “high places,” Obama…
Obama is a “Non-Caucasian,” rather than…
Gaza: Aryan Shiites (Persians) attempt…
Due to Muslim birthright, the gravity of…
Republican meltdown: Terminology and semantics…
A Republican meltdown: Sensationalism;…
Because Barak Obama is a Mulatto man, no…
The 2008 US election; was Allah a factor…
Obama versus McCain: Of the people?
Clinton: Because, he is like me…
Iran’s election was determined by Khameny…
Would Obama include Ayers, Wright, and Farrakhan…
Obama covering his A– too soon: bin Ladin…
Ten Commandments: Don’t kill, nothing about torture…
Obama v. Reagan: The orator v. the communicator…
Obama must learn to speak TO, not AT, the audience…
Obama, a figment of the public imagination…
Calling a spade a spade: More people killed…
Orator v. Doer: Where is the Beef?
Caroline and the [mediocre] JFK Legacy!
Obama’s first week: Where is the beef?
Cheney, like Limbaugh, is flirting with…
America: We are not the “greatest…”
Had McCain been President, Captain Phill…
About to be published.
Is democratic politics synonymous with…
We now know the “virtual” Barak Hussein…
Obama: Great orator, marginal communicator…
VP’s do matter! A [often] Republican…
Ahmadinejad (Iran) -2; Olmert/Livni (Israel)…
With tongue in cheek: If re-elected in…
Since elected: Obama slowly, deliberately…
Muslin control of oil; an unintended…
Biden: Will the tail wag the dog?
Prejean, and Palin, disgraceful GOP voice…
Oprah, Palin, and Color:…
Limbaugh, Shakespeare, Providence;…
Obama and Palin: The Untouchables?
If Unilateral Israeli cease-fire holds;…
Hamas “Christmas-attack;” Islam’s disrespect…
“Time-table:” Wind removed from Obama…
Ahmadinejad: A Jewish/Aryan attempting…
Obama: Time to stop campaigning and star…
From the Creator: Obama, everybody’s…
Rush Limbaugh, and Dick Cheney; their…
Is [Islamic] blood thicker than Wright’s…
Stimulus conservatives’ doom prophecy:…
Islamic-Pride: The US Election…
Governor Palin, Secretary Rice,; …
Vacationing while Georgia is Burning?
Sarah Palin, the perfect Republican “sacfifice”…
Obama’s: Why “borrow” words?
Islamic roots: The measure!
Iran’s election: Ahmadinejad trumps Obama…
$900M+ Secretary Clinton present to Ahmadinejad…
Irresponsible delay in additional troop…
Secretaries of State: Albright, Rice, Clinton…
The Chimpanzee cartoon v. Common sense…
Because Obama is only partially African-American…
Palin: From hockey-mom to Governor, to President…
Should President Obama be held personally…
Obama: Time to stop campaigning, start governing…
Humility is a pre-requisite for the glob…
Obama is a Mulatto, a “non Caucasian,” …
Is the United States at war? If it is…
The “virtual” Obama wins again! When will…
Jimmy Carter; disgracing the Office…
Biased, and Disgraceful US Political…
Israel, 50 new settlement units authorize…
The message in the “Western Wall”…
Will as Hussein, Obama refrain from death…
Palin: On target? Is democracy failing?
Where is the Change We Can Believe in?
Candidate families: A part of the process…
Would Wright, Ayers & Farrakhan part…
In the case of Iran: Could it be that Obama…
Torture: Those who did not serve in war…
“Dire projections,” Obama covering his a–…
The “virtual” Barack Obama; or, when will…
Why is it acceptable to kill the “enemy…
The Constitution adopted its policy from…
Obama’s “Character,” is there something…
Obama unleashing Geithner, his secret weapon…
Inaugurating the first “non Caucasian,”…
________________________________________________________________________
Returning to the purpose and reason for this blog:
Particular attention will be given to the fact that the major source of today international terror is done in the name of Islam, and the largest single event that destroyed [innocent] people, and did so because of their religious beliefs, or ethnicity, was the Holocaust. The fact that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vows to “wipe Israel off the map,” an act that he may well be able to carry out after enough nuclear devices are produced by his regime, will be carefully monitored, especially in light of that fact that such an event would be approaching the magnitude of the Holocaust, if it occurs.
Close scrutiny will be given the Middle East, including, but not limited to the fact that the State of Israel is the major obstacle to Islamic encroachment on the Western world. Will Israel with its formidable nuclear arsenal, “take-out” Ahamadinejad’s nuclear capability, which could be deployed against Europe, as well as Israel? The apparent deterioration in United States relations with Israel will also be reviewed, especially with an eye on President Obama’s apparent Islamic sympathies, which do not seem to be always reciprocal.
In the Twenty-first Century armed conflict seems to be concentrated among Muslims. War between brethren (i.e. Yeman and Saudi; Somalia; the Sudan, etc.), or conflict in the name of Islam, a Jihad, if you will, the means for forcing Islam on the world. Another item of interest has to do with the fact that the Muslims are divided, Shiites, Sunnis, and others, they are continuously at each other’s throat. Islam is using Israel, or what they call Zionism, as a uniting element, a “temporary glue” that hold them together for their present common cause, if they did not have Zionism to exploit, and their own one can expect a set of catastrophic conflicts (i.e. the recent Iran/Iraq war, etc.).
Not being Islamophobic, I have read the Koran and realize that those who believe, those who accept its words, must rid the word od infidels, not a peaceful suitable for civilized societies. That notwithstanding, it is clear that modern Muslims can, and do, accept the Koran in a manner compatible with Twenty-first Century society; and, like religious Jews who do not put to death those who do keep the Sabbath, or stone adulterers, adhere to the religion yet let others (infidels) believe as they wish.
Strict adherence to the Koran requires all Muslims to destroy infidels, but in reality, most Muslims accept a compromise, just like Christians, and Jews do, and adjust to be compatible with the world in which they live.
Rigid-religions, same-sex marriage, and reality. Or, “same-sex” and 2012 US election:
Posted: May 15, 2012 Filed under: Rigid religions versus civil progress i.e. same-sex marriage, Uncategorized | Tags: Rigid religions and US same-sex marriage laws Leave a comment »Mislead Gay Voting? Or, a conflict with rigid-religions?
In a fair world, one with no inequities, Gays would have the same rights as do straights; in the real world, however, primarily due to religions, this is not yet the case.
However, my advice to gays:
When you first wake up in the morning and look at the mirror what do you see? If you see a gay person; you need change your perspective! You are not a gay person, you are first a human being, a person, if you will, an American (or a member of another nation) who happens to be gay. This is not an affliction, but a natural state that is much like numerous others.
The main reason gays in America do not have the right to same-sex marriage has to do with religion, not with the nation civil laws. And, inasmuch as the founders tried to separate church from state, full separation is far from a reality.
One hears a great deal of talk about “radical Islam,” a religion that seeks world domination and does not allow for any civil flexibilities. Let me make one correction: It is not radical that counts, it is RIGID! By its nature Islam, as are Judaism, and Christianity, are radical religions, but through the ages the two older “brothers” of Islam learned that rigdity in a dynamic world does not work, and there became pragmatic, and flexible.
As flexible as Judaism and Christianity have become, both are in general against same-sex marriage and have tremendous influence on US law and culture. With religion loosing its grip on the American nation, so will be restrictions to accepting same-sex relationships, but it will still take some time.
It is obvious that gay people do not wish to wait, why should they? After all, we are speaking of rights! They should for the sake of reality, for the sake of being pragmatic. Forcing the issue now ill only muddy the waters and cause additional delays; waiting its turn, and playing the [political] system, will pay dividends.
Since same-sex marriage is one of many pressing issues that the country faces, it would behoove gays to vote for whoever can solve the majority of issues and not let the issue of same-sex marriage clutter their good judgement.
The day for legal same-sex marriage in the United States is on the nation’s agenda, it will soon become the law of the land, even though a few more years may have to pass.
US President: Manager to Trump Ideologue!
Posted: April 25, 2012 Filed under: US needs manager not ideologue at helm | Tags: Obama ideologue to be replaced Leave a comment »US President: Manager to Trump Ideologue!
When a country like the United States has a relatively satisfactory form of government, it does not require an ideologue at its helm. The US democracy has proven itself, the founding fathers demonstrated uncanny foresight and gave the nation an outstanding constitution with which to guide the country.
Barak Hussein Obama is an ideologue, but worse than that, President Obama does not even stick with his ideologue making it an obstacle to progress.
Obama, the countries Capitulator in Chief (C.i.C.) gave up on the key element (public option) of his likely unconstitutional healthcare legislation, he capitulated on the Bush tax cut to the rich, the debt ceiling, and the list goes on.
When an ideologue, or a person who represent himself as being one sacrifices key beliefs in favor of expediency, such as President Obama seems to do when political gain appears to be gained, said person’s credibility suffers, and image gets tarnished. Obama’s failures to live up to promises of change and his poor conduct of foreign policy renders the young American President a failure. The Obama/Clinton doctrine in the Middle East, for example proved a total disaster. Participating in the removal of political/military-autocrats from office to only see said regimes replaced by religious-autocracies under Sharia law such as are the cases of Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt, was the unintended, but actual consequence of the doctrine.
In the domestic arena the Obama Administration boasts a failed economic policy with high unemployment and a national debt larger than was accumulated by all previous US Presidents combined. Obama three years in office qualifies him with Jimmy Carter, and George W. Bush, as one of the three worst Presidents in US history.
What the country needs in order to live up to its potential is a good Administrator, and young people are quick to understand that point. The way things go, President Obama may be lucky if he gets a majority of young people votes, or win the 2012 election.
Democracy cannot Co-Exist with [orthodox] Religion:
Posted: April 23, 2012 Filed under: Religion cannot Co-exist as equal in democracy, Uncategorized | Tags: Religion and democracy can not Co-exist as equals 1 Comment »Neither man, nor a nation, “can serve two masters.”
Since a democracy, in many of its forms, is a system where the majority of the people hold the final authority, and because all [monotheist] religions accept a G-d as the supreme authority, the two cannot Co-exist unless one, likely religion, is subservient to the other.
The 2012 United States Republican primaries brought to the forefront the issue of religion and a democratic state Co-existing as equals. One of the leading potential GOP nominees, Rick Santorum, a highly religious Catholic demonstrated the conflict when religion and democracy are vying for authority.
Nick Santorum, the ex-Senator from Pennsylvania, said, among many other things, that when he listened to President Kennedy, the first Catholic President of the United States, say that he, President Kennedy, would not allow religion to interfere with governing, that he, Senator Santorum, “nearly pukes!” Santorum, the young Pennsylvanian ex-Senator made the point of this post clear, religion and a democratic government cannot exist a Co-equals, one must be subservient to the other. Pragmatically, as a number of religious “Republics” demonstrate, when religion is the dominant authority, democracy is simply ridiculed. A case in point is the Islamic Republic of Iran, a country in which elections are simply a display of autocracy, the leader is always elected, always elected by plurality that is completely inconsistent with free-will.
Samples from around the world demonstrate conclusively that for religion to survive, and even prosper, in a democracy, it must be subservient to civil law. Many religious zealots, such as Senator Santorum, would likely argue the point, yet examples abound, in support of this contention. In a democracy, the relations between religion and state authority cannot be abused without repercussions. For example, when the Obama Administration of the United States attempted to force religious institutions, such as Catholic schools, to provide contraceptives to its members, the democratic process came into play, and the Administration had to back down from its stance.
Even in the State of Israel, a sample of an effective democratic system, but a system that is greatly influenced by religion, civil law prevails. Israel, unlike the United States, has many political parties with widely varying views. Because of the plurality of opinions, the Israeli Government, since the establishment of the State, always included an orthodox religious party in the ruling coalition. As the result of the greater than common religious influence on state governance, Israeli law includes many provisions which the secular part of the population dislikes, but that originates in religious law. Even in Israel, however, in all critical issues civil law is the law of the land.
United States religious leaders must realize, as most do, that their desires must comply the law of the land, or perish.
Finally: Religion can play a major role in the governance of a democratic country, but it must not interfere with civil law, or be destroyed!
Obama’s formative years, the Islamic influences:
Posted: March 30, 2012 Filed under: Effects of Obama's Islamic formative years on character, Uncategorized | Tags: Obama's formative Islamic upbringing, Obama's Islamic instincts 1 Comment »Obama’s formative years, the Islamic influences:
The Christian Obama, who, as the name [Hussein] implies, is a man with Islamic roots and instincts:
There is little or no doubt that Barak Hussein Obama is a practicing Christian. That fact notwithstanding, President’s Obama words and action are quite consistent with a person of Islamic background with Islamic instincts, and influences.
Even though Barak Hussein Obama is a practicing, and apparently a devout, Christian, the young American President often displays Muslim traits. President Obama started to openly demonstrate his sympathies with his infamous Cairo speech, a speech during which time he apologized to the Islamic world for America’s historical treatment of Muslims. Many people, generally with good reason, feel that Obama crossed the line by suggesting that the United States was in the habit of taking advantage of Muslims in previous times.
From a pragmatic point of view, those who insist that Barak Hussein Obama is a Muslim are wrong! Technically, however, by strict interpretation of Islamic law, Barak Hussein Obama is Muslin, and shall be so in perpetuity. Even though most claim that his father was only a secular Muslim, or perhaps an atheist, the fact that he came from a Muslim family, and that he named his son, Hussein, one of the most important names in Islam, is quite a clear indication that, at least technically, Barak Obama is a Muslim by virtue of his birthrights.
There is no question that Western nations derived [economic] benefits from dealing with oil producing Muslim nations, but in return, the same nations, particularly the United Kingdom, created sovereign Arab nations with richness beyond compare. Not only did the United Kingdom (UK), mostly under League of Nations auspices, and often without legal authority, create wealthy nations; the UK took uncivilized nomads and made them rich sovereign international powerhouses.
As an ally of the UK, the United States (US) was also responsible of the alignment of Middle East power, and can be held partially responsible for the instability in the region, but inconsistent with President Obama’s apology, the US did exploit the Muslim word, to the contrary, the US helped make the Muslim word into a recognized and influential member of the international community.
Beyond the apology to the Islamic world, Obama’s instincts drove him into helping to create a number of Sharia ruled nations out of old autocracies such as Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt. Additionally, President Obama, in spite of tough talk, is allowing Iran to mock his efforts at diplomacy, and to act in a manner “disputable” with numerous United Nations resolutions.
Obama’s dealings with Israel are cordial, the young US President does not treat Israel badly since he understands the potential political ramifications if he does not support Israel’s defense needs. On the surface Obama is cool, he went as far as to give Benyamin Netanyahu, Israel’s Prime Minister, the cold shoulder, action that gain him numerous “points” from his oil-producing Muslim friends. Behind the scenes, President Obama did make sure that Israel military supplies were met, he did not only match previous Presidents, he out did all his predecessors.
President Obama probably is even aware of the fact that Islamic associations formed a great deal of his being, and that his instincts are rooted more in Islam than they are in Christianity.
How important is that? One may ask. In most situations the President’s Islamic behavior may not be very consequential in performing his job. In cases, however, when issues are associated with Islam emerge, the American President is more often than not incapable of dealing with then in a disassociated manner, often creating chaotic situations that are not conducive to well managed affairs of state.
Keystone: A Strategic, not [primarily] an economic move.
Posted: March 10, 2012 Filed under: Keystone pipeline to offer strategic benefits to US | Tags: Keystone major strategic value to US, Oil to economy as Oxygen to life 2 Comments »Think strategy:
The US, under the Obama Administration does not seem to think in pragmatic terms about strategy. The Keystone pipeline project is a very good example. Should the Canadian oil be [physically] in the US, and should “imported” oil be restricted (closure of Hormuz, or whatever,) the US would be in a position to “confiscate” that oil for its own [domestic] use!
Without energy no modern economy can function, having in your territory oil, regardless of who technically owns said oil is an important security consideration; it is not an environmental issue! Such oil going through the United States, even though it may represent some environmental challenges, should not be primarily viewed as an issue of added profit to the oil companies, even though it may be so in the short-term.
Energy is the fuel that drives modern economies; you can NEVER have too much oil. Oil is to an economy, to health of a country as Oxygen is to life; it is a necessary, not a luxury. A functioning Keystone with proper safeguards would be a true [strategic] boon to the United States, while an economic shot in the arm to both Canada and the United States.
Why Romney should prevail! In 2012 elections it’s Ability not Personality, Stupid!
Posted: March 3, 2012 Filed under: not personable, US President need competance rather than charm | Tags: Ability not personality for President Leave a comment »Why Romney should prevail:
In the 2012 election it’s Ability not Personality, Stupid!
Even though President George W. Bush was one of the three worst US Presidents in recent history, he was the kind of person who almost everybody would like to join for a beer. Being personable is not qualification for being effective President.
The three worst Presidents, Jimmy Carter, George W. Bush, and Barak Obama, were all more personable than is Mitt Romney, but Romney has a proven record of a plotter who understand how to conduct a successful business. Mitt Romney is not as fast on his feet as are Gingrich, Santorum, or even Dr. Paul, but Romney brings management experience to the party that none of the others do. Barak Obama, much like Newt Gingrich is Charismatic, fast on his feet, and smart, but like Gingrich, and Santorum he does not know how to stay on message, or how to manage a business (the country IS a large business.)
Mitt Romney is not the epitome of intelligence, he is not quick on his feet, and perhaps stumbles from time-to-time when he speaks, but he has a good track of a business manager who understand how effectively deal with profit and loss.
This is not to say that Mitt Romney would be the best President that could be produced in the United States, but it is to say that of all five potential candidates: Paul, Gingrich, Santorum, Obama, and Romney, Mitt Romney is likely to make the most effective President.
Let me the first to admit that there might others in the United States who could be better candidates than is Mitt Romney. Michael Bloomberg is an example of someone who could probably make as, or more effective President than Mitt Romney. There are, of course, many others potential candidates, but since of the five vying for the position of President Mitt Romney, in spite of not oozing charisma, is by for the most qualified person to become US President.
Re. Iran: Would Israel need to relieve an Islamophobic Obama?
Posted: February 24, 2012 Filed under: Due to Obama's Islamophobia would Israel become US surrogate in iran conflict | Tags: Is Obama's US impotent regarding Iran? Leave a comment »Re. Iran: Would Israel need to relieve an Islamophobic Obama?
President Obama seems to fear conflict with Muslims. Yes, he did get bin Laden killed, but that was the result of an effort that started many years ago. “Taking out” bin Laden was a matter of necessity, not choice; the same hold true with other al Qaeda operatives that President Obama eliminated. Nore power for the Commander-in-Chief.
But: When it comes to real Islamic challenges, the young American President seems to be timid. Most alarming is his dealing with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and the Ayatollah Khomeini as they are preparing to become a nuclear power, and perhaps destroy the State of Israel. President Barak Hussein Obama, and his Secretary of State Clinton, keep insisting that sanctions and diplomacy can work, they are doing so in spite of clear statements from Ahmadinejad that as long as the United States is [even] friendly with Israel, Iran will not engage in dialogue with it.
The Iranians are serious! Actions by Iran, starting with reverse sanctions against the West will start to have significant effect on the world economy, an unhealthy economy, as it is! Cutting oil to Europe would sooner, or later add to price of Gasoline in the United States, and would get Americans to either to recognize the problem as one directly associated with Islam’s desire for world domination, and insist that the United States take action against Iran, or feel that if the United States forsakes Israel, matters “will return to normal,” a myth, but a potential fall out of US inaction. Would Obama inaction cause the return in the United States of bumper stickers stating: “Less Jews, more oil?” Or, would the United States live-up to it singular “superpower?”
In spite of all Unites States support of Israel, including important supply of bunker-busting bombs, Israel is in no position to take on Iran without help. Israel may win a short-term conflict, but should it be forced to do so, the toll on its economy would be enormous, the fragility of its existence become even more alarming than it is now.
If the Unites States relinquish its role as the super-power and essentially force Israel to do its dirty work with Iran, what credibility would the United States have remaining?
Is Obama reluctant to hold a hard-line with Islamic regimes the result of his formative years among Muslims, or is it because he doe not have the intestinal fortitude to do the job for which he was elected? There not seem to be an answer to these questions, but the results are alarming! The United States must have a chief executive who can stand for its interests regardless what phobias he, or she, may have.
Shared with: www.zyonism.com
Obama’s new crutch, “no silver bullet,” is it racist? A weak energy speech!
Posted: February 24, 2012 Filed under: President Obama offers no relief for gasoline prices | Tags: No silver-bullet for gasoline Leave a comment »Obama’s new crutch, “no silver bullet,” is it racist?
Choosing, as President Obama did, the term “no silver bullet,” as a reference to no easy solution, was not only “dated,” but coming from a long defunct television show, the Lone Ranger, ill-advised. The Lone Ranger, was a fine old Western, however, it depicted the hero’s Indian sidekick, Tonto, as an inferior stereotype of American Indians. The choice of silver-bullet, which the President repeated several times during his speech about gasoline, and energy, can not only view as racist, it is so outdated, that many, many young people would not know the source of the term.
The Lone Ranger used silver bullets in his six-shooter to perform all kind of heroic deeds, it is sad that President Obama has no such bullets in his arsenal.
Another issue from the energy speech has to do with the fact that no mention was made of Keystone, a major energy issue, if there ever was one! When discussing issues President Obama needs to learn that he must always deal with those items with which he is uncomfortable.
The President’s gasoline speech was at best weak, at worst inappropriate after just rejecting, or postponing the Keystone project. The President offered no short-term solutions, spoke of future work, and was generally disappointing.
