Calling a spade a spade: More people killed in the name of religion than for any other reason. The Holocaust, and Islamic Jihad, two leading offenders!
Posted: October 7, 2008 Filed under: debate & financial responsibility, Israel "taking out" Iran's nukes with its own arsenal!, Obama's Islamic sympatheies and weakening US/Israel relations, Obama's Sacrificing alliances is an alarming trend, Profiling Muslim to protect majority a must, Realizing that Islam is violent but accepting that not a Muslims are, Strict aderence to Koran requires violence but most Muslims compromise, The right of the many supercedes that of the few Muslim and profiling, The unconventional politically unaffiliated blog | Tags: again population, dysfunctional economy, Financial bailout; dysfunctional economy, goverment failure, hearing, Islam is not peaceful but Muslims can be!, Profiling Muslims a must, Profiling to protect population at large OK, television, The unconventional politically unaffiliated blog 1 Comment »This blog is intended to dispel notions that religions are peaceful, and that in order to be “politically correct,” one must not offend believers.
Attention will be given to United States politics versus that of others, and a discussion of how the present Administration is dealing with friends, and with foes, will take place. With a critical eye, discussion of the Administration “political correctness,” and its blind-eye to violent Islam (and that of other religions,) will be pursued.
An examination of the need to maintain the quality of life of as much of the American public as possible (even at the expense of some minorities,) in face of terrorist threats to the United States, will take place. The premise that “the good of the many supersedes that of the few,” will be examined in face of the fact that Muslims should be “profiled” based on the role members of their Islamic faith play in most of today’s terrorist acts around the word.
The view of this blog is that “profiling” can be done with care, and without causing undue indignities to those being “profiled.” Those “profiled” can be made to understand that the act is not against them individually, but that it is rather because they happen to be members of a group that endanger others. Israel is a case in point. Israeli security screeners seem to go to great length not to offend those Muslims that they “profile;” there is no reason why American “profilers” cannot do the same.
Finally, American foreign policy will be reviewed, especially as it relates to the Middle East, to United States and the Islamic World, and to its relations with “friends and foes,” alike. Special attention will be given to the United States failure to reduce threats from the likes of North Korea, and Iran…
__________________________________________________________________
UPDATE, March 19, 2010
Jerusalem, Israel’s Capital in Perpetuity
Obama Orator extraordinaire, poor communicator
—-See archives March and February
FOLLOWING IS A PARTIAL LIST OF PUBLICATIONS TO DATE (01/18/2010); please visit “archives,” start with the most recent post (January,) and others will follow in sequence:
OVERVIEW:
Calling a spade a spade: More people killed in the name of religion…
About Dangoor (Dan Goor)
dscf1562a
All of Jerusalem is Israel’s via Divine…
“Divine” obstacles may well dismantle 2-state…
Israel has no occupied land…
Neither pure socialism, nor pure capitalism…
The Koran is Islam’s declaration of war…
OBAMA’S PRESIDENCY
Al-Arabia: Obama’s Islamic roots emerging…
Al-Arabia interview: No apologies for the US…
Obama’s Iran appeasement; a systematic…
Notwithstanding questionable performance…
Obama’s fast-track to worst ever US President…
Ode to Obama: Kudos, from [just] a great…
MUSLIMS PROFILING
Should the Ft. Hood massacre be…
Profiling Muslims versus Civil-rights…
Time to formally profile Muslims! Time…
Is Obama trying to “whitewash” the Ft. Hood…
Obama irrational with Muslims: Example…
Statistics support Muslim profiling…
ISRAEL, IRAN, & OBAMA
Deadline for Israel take-out of Iran’s nukes…
Will Obama shoot down Israeli planes over Iraq…
Will Obama order US forces to shoot down Israeli…
Obama’s Hanukkah, a blatant anti-Jewish…
Anti-Jewish versus anti-Semitic; Obama’s…
Is your enemy’s enemy your friend? Hosni Mubarak…
Your friends’ enemies are your enemies!
Obama: An enemy Israel does not need!
THE MEDIA
“Political-media,” altruisticly called: “News Media”…
Rove and Morris, the epitome of losers…
Rush Limbaugh’s anti-Semitic/Jewish reference…
Glenn Beck, a Limbaugh wannabe, an actor…
Limbaugh’s, versus the factual, truths…
Limbaugh: Drown the baby (America’s…
Coulter and Limbaugh: Anything for attention…
Inflexibility of most US political [media...
Reverse racism, was Limbaugh right? The...
Fox News versus the Obama Administration...
OBAMA THE PERSON
Obama: The arrogance of power! His self...
The "Cultural-Islamization," under Obama...
Obama's "cultural Islamization" of the US...
OBAMA'S AFGHANISTAN, & OTHER MILITARY
Obama's Afghanistan actions exonerated Bush...
Obama must relieve McChrystal, or send...
Scenario: 100000+ Allies troops for Afghanistan...
Not able to secure allies support, Afghanistan...
Now that Gates agrees: 100,000+ troops...
Afghanistan: A new Iraq? The case for overwhelming...
Obama's Afghanistan: Is it deja vu? Obama...
More troops to Afghanistan versus Nobel
Obama: "The" [world] expert on missile defence…
Obama’s scrapping Europe missile defense…
Obama’s “Change:” The most political White House…
Obama’s monumental blunder: 25% less troops…
OBAMA’S “HONORS”
Arafat and Obama; Nobel and other common…
Obama’s Nobel selection: Another anti-Jewish…
Obama, the Nobel [Peace Prize] “Sham!”
“Person of the Year;” Why?
THE ECONOMY
Stimulus must be based on “buy American”…
The “bailouts” crime…
Obama’s “infrastructure” infusion; DOA…
Dubai: Tip of the iceberg, a sign of…
US economy must return to product-based…
As lacking as it is, Stimulus deserves…
Obama’s Productless Economic Plan is Doomed…
OBAMA’S HEALTHCARE
Obama’s Healthcare bill: “Daley style” politics…
Health care and the Peter Principle;
Obama’s health plan address, a bad idea!
Obama: Not a visionary!
Obama: The stereotype Chicago Politician!
Obama’s Healthcare speech: Another Clinton…
Palin’s “death squads” claim is false, but…
MISC.
In spite of Jews in “high places,” Obama…
Obama is a “Non-Caucasian,” rather than…
Gaza: Aryan Shiites (Persians) attempt…
Due to Muslim birthright, the gravity of…
Republican meltdown: Terminology and semantics…
A Republican meltdown: Sensationalism;…
Because Barak Obama is a Mulatto man, no…
The 2008 US election; was Allah a factor…
Obama versus McCain: Of the people?
Clinton: Because, he is like me…
Iran’s election was determined by Khameny…
Would Obama include Ayers, Wright, and Farrakhan…
Obama covering his A– too soon: bin Ladin…
Ten Commandments: Don’t kill, nothing about torture…
Obama v. Reagan: The orator v. the communicator…
Obama must learn to speak TO, not AT, the audience…
Obama, a figment of the public imagination…
Calling a spade a spade: More people killed…
Orator v. Doer: Where is the Beef?
Caroline and the [mediocre] JFK Legacy!
Obama’s first week: Where is the beef?
Cheney, like Limbaugh, is flirting with…
America: We are not the “greatest…”
Had McCain been President, Captain Phill…
About to be published.
Is democratic politics synonymous with…
We now know the “virtual” Barak Hussein…
Obama: Great orator, marginal communicator…
VP’s do matter! A [often] Republican…
Ahmadinejad (Iran) -2; Olmert/Livni (Israel)…
With tongue in cheek: If re-elected in…
Since elected: Obama slowly, deliberately…
Muslin control of oil; an unintended…
Biden: Will the tail wag the dog?
Prejean, and Palin, disgraceful GOP voice…
Oprah, Palin, and Color:…
Limbaugh, Shakespeare, Providence;…
Obama and Palin: The Untouchables?
If Unilateral Israeli cease-fire holds;…
Hamas “Christmas-attack;” Islam’s disrespect…
“Time-table:” Wind removed from Obama…
Ahmadinejad: A Jewish/Aryan attempting…
Obama: Time to stop campaigning and star…
From the Creator: Obama, everybody’s…
Rush Limbaugh, and Dick Cheney; their…
Is [Islamic] blood thicker than Wright’s…
Stimulus conservatives’ doom prophecy:…
Islamic-Pride: The US Election…
Governor Palin, Secretary Rice,; …
Vacationing while Georgia is Burning?
Sarah Palin, the perfect Republican “sacfifice”…
Obama’s: Why “borrow” words?
Islamic roots: The measure!
Iran’s election: Ahmadinejad trumps Obama…
$900M+ Secretary Clinton present to Ahmadinejad…
Irresponsible delay in additional troop…
Secretaries of State: Albright, Rice, Clinton…
The Chimpanzee cartoon v. Common sense…
Because Obama is only partially African-American…
Palin: From hockey-mom to Governor, to President…
Should President Obama be held personally…
Obama: Time to stop campaigning, start governing…
Humility is a pre-requisite for the glob…
Obama is a Mulatto, a “non Caucasian,” …
Is the United States at war? If it is…
The “virtual” Obama wins again! When will…
Jimmy Carter; disgracing the Office…
Biased, and Disgraceful US Political…
Israel, 50 new settlement units authorize…
The message in the “Western Wall”…
Will as Hussein, Obama refrain from death…
Palin: On target? Is democracy failing?
Where is the Change We Can Believe in?
Candidate families: A part of the process…
Would Wright, Ayers & Farrakhan part…
In the case of Iran: Could it be that Obama…
Torture: Those who did not serve in war…
“Dire projections,” Obama covering his a–…
The “virtual” Barack Obama; or, when will…
Why is it acceptable to kill the “enemy…
The Constitution adopted its policy from…
Obama’s “Character,” is there something…
Obama unleashing Geithner, his secret weapon…
Inaugurating the first “non Caucasian,”…
________________________________________________________________________
Returning to the purpose and reason for this blog:
Particular attention will be given to the fact that the major source of today international terror is done in the name of Islam, and the largest single event that destroyed [innocent] people, and did so because of their religious beliefs, or ethnicity, was the Holocaust. The fact that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vows to “wipe Israel off the map,” an act that he may well be able to carry out after enough nuclear devices are produced by his regime, will be carefully monitored, especially in light of that fact that such an event would be approaching the magnitude of the Holocaust, if it occurs.
Close scrutiny will be given the Middle East, including, but not limited to the fact that the State of Israel is the major obstacle to Islamic encroachment on the Western world. Will Israel with its formidable nuclear arsenal, “take-out” Ahamadinejad’s nuclear capability, which could be deployed against Europe, as well as Israel? The apparent deterioration in United States relations with Israel will also be reviewed, especially with an eye on President Obama’s apparent Islamic sympathies, which do not seem to be always reciprocal.
In the Twenty-first Century armed conflict seems to be concentrated among Muslims. War between brethren (i.e. Yeman and Saudi; Somalia; the Sudan, etc.), or conflict in the name of Islam, a Jihad, if you will, the means for forcing Islam on the world. Another item of interest has to do with the fact that the Muslims are divided, Shiites, Sunnis, and others, they are continuously at each other’s throat. Islam is using Israel, or what they call Zionism, as a uniting element, a “temporary glue” that hold them together for their present common cause, if they did not have Zionism to exploit, and their own one can expect a set of catastrophic conflicts (i.e. the recent Iran/Iraq war, etc.).
Not being Islamophobic, I have read the Koran and realize that those who believe, those who accept its words, must rid the word od infidels, not a peaceful suitable for civilized societies. That notwithstanding, it is clear that modern Muslims can, and do, accept the Koran in a manner compatible with Twenty-first Century society; and, like religious Jews who do not put to death those who do keep the Sabbath, or stone adulterers, adhere to the religion yet let others (infidels) believe as they wish.
Strict adherence to the Koran requires all Muslims to destroy infidels, but in reality, most Muslims accept a compromise, just like Christians, and Jews do, and adjust to be compatible with the world in which they live.
Would you buy a used car from Newt Gingrich?
Posted: January 22, 2012 Filed under: Gingrich a manipulator of facts would you buy a used car from the ex-Speaker? | Tags: Would you buy a used car from Newt Gingrich Leave a comment »Befor you vote, or answer poles about a candidate, you should ask youself : Would I buy a used car fro that person?
I would have no problems buying a used car from three of the four GOP candidates still in the race; I would not buy one from Newt Gingrich.
Newt Gingrich is a very smart man, perhaps too smart to be President of the United States. In the debate during which he was asked about the ABC interview with his second wife. Mr. Gingrich showed how quick, intelligent, but unscrupulous, he is; the ex-Speaker ignores the facts and attacked the media, the carrier of bad news, if you will. The crowds loved him and cheered, but the fact remains, he ignored facts, changed the subject, and made it appear that those who informed the public of the events of which he was guilty, were the culprits, removing the burden from him.
Newt Gingrich habitually twists fact to suit his purpose. His ethics situation at the House of Representatives was a case in point. The ex-Speaker convened the IRS that classes he gave were educational, when in reality they were very partisan, and should have been taxes as a political effort.
Would you buy a use car from Newt Gingrich? I would not!
Gingrich ethics violations: His words don’t count!
Posted: January 22, 2012 Filed under: Gingrich's words about ethics violation don't cut it formal data must be provided!, Uncategorized | Tags: Gingrich cannot be trusted to dispute ethic charges Leave a comment »Gingrich ethics violations: His words don’t count!
His income and source of most of his income suggest that the ex-Speaker is a lobbyist; no historian, who he claims to be would be paid millions from an entity involved in real estate. Mr. Gingrich often speaks words that do not seem to be consistent with facts. The issue of his ethics violations is a case in point. I heard some of the ex-Speaker classes; his claim that they were non-partisan is clearly false; the IRS should have classified them as political, and treated in that manner.
Words from the ex-Speaker about his ethics violations are not going to clean the slate! Unless Mr. Gingrich’s words are accompanied with a release of all formal documentation associated with the hearings, and a formal release of those involved in the investigation of their confidentiality obligations, the ex-Speaker will, as he should, remain guilty in the eyes of the public. Mr. Gingrich, a very ambitious man, would not have resigned his seat in the House of Representatives if there were no fire behind the ethics violations smoke.
The only way Mr. Gingrich can clean the slate is by allowing Pelosi, and all other involved in the investigation to speak about it without violation any confidentiality obligations, while at the same time release all formal documents related to that investigation. Where there is smoke there is fire!
Mr. Gingrich would not have resigned his position in the House if he did not do anything wrong! If the ex-Speaker wishes to be elected to the highest office in the land, the least he can do is come clean and allow the public to know who he really is!
Expect: 2012 Palin/Gingrich GOP ticket!
Posted: January 22, 2012 Filed under: 2012 GOP ticket: Palin/Gingrich | Tags: GOP 2012 ticket Palin/Gingrich Leave a comment »The 2012 GOP ticket: Sarah Palin with Newt Gingrich as her running mate!
Even though the quitting-Governor lady of Alaska is totally unqualified for the job of President, she has shown excellent political judgment. She knew that she could not be competitive in the debates (her voice, if nothing else,) semi endorsed Gingrich so he “owes” her, and is keeping her name in front of the public, just enough, not to be destroyed by the primary process.
Just like Romney’s bet: $—-.00 on: A 2012 Palin/Gingrich GOP ticket!
Evangelism and Gingrich: An Oxymoron!
Posted: January 21, 2012 Filed under: Newt Gingrich too unethical to be US President. | Tags: Gingrich a personality of contradictions! Leave a comment »Evangelism and Gingrich, an Oxymoron!
If there ever was a mismatch between behavior and belief, the United States’ ex-Speaker of the House of Representatives, Newt Gingrich, is a great example of such situation.
If, as the pundits predict, Mr. Gingrich does well with the evangelistic people of South Carolina, one could easily lose respect for those who put, what they must perceive to be expedience, ahead of religious conviction.
Ex-Speaker Gingrich converted to Catholicism after his two major infidelities, and he asked forgiveness, he repented…But, after two failed marriages, and being found guilty of ethics violation at the House of Representatives, does it appear as if the Speaker’s character make him suitable for the highest office of the United States?
Ex-Speaker Gingrich is a smart person, but the man is clearly an opportunist who puts his own personal interests at the forefront of everything in his life; is that the kind of man the United States wants to be its President? I think not!
“Harder to govern with [destructive] media;” isn’t this a democracy? Mr. Gingrich. “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen!”
Posted: January 20, 2012 Filed under: Gingrich not comfotable with media should get out | Tags: Governing in democracy require dealing with media Leave a comment »“Harder to govern with [destructive] media;” isn’t this a democracy? Mr. Gingrich. “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen!”
To Gingrich: If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen!
Newt Gingrich says that it is too difficult to manage where the media can be dig into one’s personal life. Gingrich leaves out the fact personal life is a measure of character, and character is the most important trait a President must possess.
The ex-Speaker, Newt Gingrich, takes liberties with facts, as well as with morality in order to make his case. The ex-Speaker is willing to sacrifice morality and good behavior for votes. For example, in South Carolina with 28% African-American population the ex-Speaker feels free to say things that are offensive to that minority, things that he would never dare use in the general election, should he become the GOP nominee.
Nick Santorum gave a good view of the ex-Speaker: A man with grandiose ideas, but without the discipline, character, or ability to deal with details, to carry out any of his ideas.
The Republicans would make a major mistake if they select Newt Gingrich to be their Presidential candidate. Such selection would give the GOP a black eye that would require many years to overcome!
Gingrich: A bundle of contradictions!
Posted: January 17, 2012 Filed under: Criticizing Romney's wealth Gingrich gets $60K per speach? | Tags: Gingrich $60K speaches Leave a comment »Newt Gingrich is a bundle of contrudictions…he claims to be a historian when in reality he is a professional politician. He complains about Mitt Romney’s wealth while bragging that he does not need lobbying income since he gets $60K per speech that he gives.
He received $1.6 million from Freddie Mac and Fannie may for advice as a historian, when his knowledge as a historian has to be with Belgian policy in Africa, a very relevant bit of knowledge on United States real-estate business.
The ex-Speaker of the United States, Newt Gingrich attempts to present himself as an intellectual with academic credentials when in reality the ex-Speaker is simply a professional politician.
Gingrich: A Historian? A lobbyist by any other name is…
Posted: January 17, 2012 Filed under: In the case of Gingrich a lobbyist under any name is a lobbyiist | Tags: Gingrich a lobbyist under any name... 1 Comment »Ex-Speaker Gingrich has a PhD in History, his dissertation has to do with the education strategy of Belgium in the Congo, not a terribly relevant topic for which Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac, would give the ex-Speaker $1,6000,000.00 for his advice as a historian!
Mr. Gingrich continues to claim that he speaks, as a historian when in reality the ex-Speaker is a politician. In order to impress his audiences and appear academician, Mr. Gingrich love to employ the term model on every turn; the ex-Speaker seems to feel that such term would separate him from his adversaries who do not appear to have experience in [computer] modeling.
Newt Gingrich dismisses the fact that he was paid as a lobbyist, the ex-Speaker does so based on a technicality, he was not registered as a lobbyist, and all lobbyist are supposed to be registered. What Gingrich overlooks is the fact that the large pay he was receiving was due to his contacts and influence in Washington, not based on his knowledge of the Belgian policies in Africa.
Newt Gingrich is a politician who tried to pass himself as an intellectual with academic background, the ploy will not succeed…
Palin with Gingrich: 2012 GOP ticket?
Posted: January 13, 2012 Filed under: Could a 2012 GOP Palin/Gingrich happen? | Tags: A Palin/Gingrich 2012 GOP ticket Leave a comment »In preparation, Sarah Palin will declare that the GOP candidates debate was a demonstration that a qualified Republican is still to be found.
Just think 2012 GOP nominees:
Palin with Gingrich
With help from ex-Speaker Gingrich all present potential nominees will continue to destroy each other! The quitter-Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, is waiting in the wings, not exposing herself to debates. When the present potential candidates demolish each other, the lady from Alaska will offer to sacrifice herself for the nation.
When the time comes the quitter-Governor will likely get a divine message to offer herself to the nation, she will capitulate and agree to be the Republican Presidential nominee.
As to Gingrich, Todd Palin, or “the first dude,” as MS Palin calls her husband, already more-or-less offered Gingrich the opportunity to be the running mate, by “endorsing” the ex-Speaker.
Capitalism versus Gingrich, Perry, et al; is it hurting the GOP?
Posted: January 11, 2012 Filed under: Using anti Capitalism tactics GOP candidates hurting the Republican Party | Tags: GOP candidates v Capitalism hurting the party 1 Comment »Newt Gingrich who claims to be a historian (a PhD dissertation about Belgian education policies in the Congo, or such “relevant” subject…) yet seems to have no clue to: What is Capitalism? Rick Perry, who governs a state with economy based on Capitalism, seems to not understand that some of the building blocks of the system are provided by VC’s, many of them in his state of Texas.
Since Venture Capital (VC) is an important fuel in the engine of Capitalism, a generally efficient fuel that have driven the booming United States economy starting in the early 1950′s, (and is still going strong,) politicians, just to suit their personal objectives, should not dismiss its value.
The fact that in the last fifty year (or a little more,) glitches appeared in the economy, has little to do with VC’s, but rather much to do with traditional and very greedy banking institutions, and gluttonous politicians. For Rick Perry to refer Venture Capital, as “vulture capital” is another demonstration of the man’s lack of knowledge and common sense.
Microsoft, Apple Computers, Staples (a “product” of Bain,) HP (made up of a number of VC products such as DEC,) are but a few example of VC’s contribution to America’s economy. For Gingrich and Perry to dismiss the value of Venture Capital and relegate it to an “anti-society,” element, is ignorant and actually stupid; it is contrary to the foundation of their party, the Republican Party!
This blog was not designed to support Mitt Romney, even though he does deserve credit for his work at Bain, the Olympics, and Massachusetts, but it was rather designed to suggest that by attacking the principles of their own party, candidates are giving ammunition to the opposition to use during the coming general election. Ex-Speaker Gingrich, the historian, should know better; Governor Perry may be simply too ignorant and unaware of the damage he is causing his own party. All that notwithstanding, it is time for Republicans to understand the foundation of their own party and protect it from the onslaught that will start in a few months during the general election.
