Calling a spade a spade: More people killed in the name of religion than any other reason. The Holocaust, and Islamic Jihad, two leading offenders!

This blog is intended to dispel notions that religions are peaceful, and that in order to be “political-correct,” one must not offend believers.

Attention will be given United States politics versus that of others, and a discussion of how the present Administration is dealing with friends, and with foes. With critical eye a discussion of the Administration political correctness, and its blind-eye to violent Islam, and that of others, will be pursued.

Particular attention will be given to the fact that the major source of today international terror is done in the name of Islam, and the largest single event that destroyed [innocent] people, and did so because of their religious beliefs, or ethnicity, was the Holocaust. The fact that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vows to “wipe Israel off the map,” an act that he may well be able to carry out after enough nuclear devices are produced by his regime, will be carefully monitored, especially in light of that fact that such an event would be approaching the magnitude of the Holocaust, if it occurs.

Close scrutiny will be given the Middle East, including, but not limited to the fact that the State of Israel is the major obstacle to Islamic encroachment on the Western world. Will Israel with its formidable nuclear arsenal, “take-out” Ahamadinejad’s nuclear capability, which could be deployed against Europe, as well as Israel? The apparent deterioration in United States relations with Israel will also be reviewed, especially with an eye on President Obama’s apparent Islamic sympathies, which do not seem to be always reciprocal.

In the Twenty-first Century armed conflict seems to be concentrated among Muslims. War between brethren (i.e. Yeman and Saudi; Somalia; the Sudan, etc.), or conflict in the name of Islam, a Jihad, if you will, the means for forcing Islam on the world. Another item of interest has to do with the fact that the Muslims are divided, Shiites, Sunnis, and others, they are continuously at each other’s throat. Islam is using Israel, or what they call Zionism, as a uniting element, a “temporary glue” that hold them together for their present common cause, if they did not have Zionism to exploit, and their own one can expect a set of catastrophic conflicts (i.e. the recent Iran/Iraq war, etc.).

Not being Islamophobic, I have read the Koran and realize that those who believe, those who accept its words, must rid the word od infidels, not a peaceful suitable for civilized societies. That notwithstanding, it is clear that modern Muslims can, and do, accept the Koran in a manner compatible with Twenty-first Century society; and, like religious Jews who do not put to death those who do keep the Sabbath, or stone adulterers, adhere to the religion yet let others (infidels) believe as they wish.

Strict adherence to the Koran requires all Muslims to destroy infidels, but in reality, most Muslims accept a compromise, just like Christians, and Jews do, and adjust to be compatible with the world in which they live.

Palin: From hockey-mom to Governor, to President, to Pope?

Sarah Palin quit Governorship to run for President, would she quit if President to try for Pope? Or, is President higher than Pope?

Or, once a quitter, always a quitter! Commitments are important, and could the act of letting Alaska’s voters down be a trend?

Enough said!

Unilaterally declared Palestinian state will be a boon for Israel!

As a governing authority, the Palestinian Authority was able to claim, once, and once again, that it does not control acts against Israel that come from its borders. The PA kept stating that acts by fringe groups such as Hamas and other Jihadies, are out of its control.
As a sovereign state, the Government of such state, will be responsible for all acts from within its border, and may be faced with a formal state of war which Israel.
If such situation develops, Israel may just welcome a formal war to use as a vehicle for “adjusting it borders,” something that it would dearly, and for good reasons, like to do.
The Palestinian authorities may wish to thing long and hard before declaring statehood, because with statehood comes responsibility, and risks, that they may well not be ready to assume.

Is Obama trying to “whitewash” the Ft. Hood massacare?

President Obama requested Congress to put off any inquiry into the Fort Hood massacre; he stated that he would like the military to conduct its own inquiry, and that Congress has “more important work.”

On the surface President Obama’s request may have some merit if not for a number of facts. The most obvious fact has to do with the military not wanting to expose its flaws in allowing the situation to occur in the first place.

But, moving on. The Congress has no more important work than fighting terror, and there are enough reason to classify the Fort Hood massacre as a terrorist act. Adding to that, getting out 100 shots from two handguns in the short time that major Hasan did his dastardly deed, would require a magician; was the Major that good, and if he was, how did a medical doctor become so proficient in the use of handguns?

There are many other reasons to suggest that an inquiry independent of the military is in order. The question that President Obama’ request raises, however, has to do with the fact that he seems to protect anything Muslim; is that his actual motive?

Ahmadinejad “line-in-the-sand,” to Obama: Drop all Israel association, or no discussions with Iran!

Ahmadinejad, at an Islamic Conference in Turkey, informed Obama that any additional association of the United States with Israel will rule out any discussions between his regime and the United States. The Iranian leader did not speak of support, but rather of any association (“clasping of the hands”,) with the State of Israel.

Will Obama further his actions of dissociation the United States from Israel and attempt to deal with Iran? Or, will Obama stay on track of historical American friendship with Israel and take “non diplomatic” steps in dealing with the Islamic Republic of Iran?

“Rhambo” to foes of Democrats, yet a puppy on Obama’s leash: Emanuel is not a friend of Israel! Or, did Ahmadinejad trump Obama, again?

Rham Emanuel, the son of a Jewish-Israeli father, is no friend of Israel! Only 4% of Israeli Jews consider President Obama a friend of Israel, and Rham Emanuel, the Presidents’s chief of staff, simply parrots his boss. Much of the bidding Rham Emanuel does on behalf of his boss, is done at the expense of Israel’s interests.

When President Obama was speaking at the Fort Hood memorial service trying to be conciliatory to Muslims, his chief of staff was substituting for him and addressing a Jewish group in Washington DC, Emanuel was simply trying to push the Obama’s agenda particularly Obama’s anti-Israel policies.

Emanuel was introduced to the Jewish audience as “one of us,” when in reality he should have been called a turn-coat on Israel and on Judaism. Emanuel called tor the immediate freeze on settlements, even though, with his upbringing, he should have realized that he was asking the Jewish people to act in a manner contrary to what their god instructed them to do. Does Rhambo Emanuel expect Israel, the Jewish people, and the Israeli leadership, to accept directives from his boss over orders from God?

A chasm between Israel and the United States grows. This wide chasm that was created by Barak Hussein Obama and his Administration in the few short months, since taking office, is becoming so wide, that regardless of how sympathetic to Israel future Administrations may be, the chasm may never be closed, and the United States may lose its most, or perhaps, only, dependable ally that it has in the Middle East.

Mahmoud Ahamdinejad just called President Obama’s bluff! The Iranian leader suggested that if President Obama wishes to engage Iran diplomatically, as he claims, the American President will have to essentially “divorce” the United States from Israel.

Barak Hussein Obama’s actions in the next few weeks will reveal his true colors; will he still insist on negotiation with Iran and tacitly accept Ahmadinejad notion that the US disassociate itself from Israel? Or, will Obama finally dispel the notion that he is anti-Jewish, and anti-Israel, and deal forcibly with the Iran’s regime?

Should President Obama capitulate to Ahmadinejad and others of his ilk, and insist on continuing diplomacy with Iran, will the Administration’s “Jewish contingency” of Emanuel, Axelrod, etc., stand behind Israel, or will these
people remain Obama’s “lap-dogs,” and support his every move, as irrational as it may be?

Prejean, and Palin, disgracful GOP voices; and a blight on American litrature!

There was a time that to publish a book in the United States one needed to have credible content, and the ability to write; things changed!

For publishers to expose the American public to Sarah Palin, an irresponsible politician, and to Carrie Prejean, a young lady who appears to do almost anything in order to get publicity, borders on the ridiculous. This is especially unreasonable since neither lady is writing her book, professional writer do the job.

Palin, the inexperienced ex Vice Presidential candidate who quit her job as governor of Alaska (letting down Alaska’s votes,) in order to “feather her own nest,” and Prejean, whose words do not reflect her actions, now have book deals, and will become wealthy at the expense of the gullible American public.

Adding insult to injury is the fact that these two ladies were embraced by many GOP conservatives who are looking for voices, especially since Rush Limbaugh the major conservative spokesperson, and the party, are now at odds. Having these two ladies appear to represent the GOP makes that party look like even a larger loser than it is!

One can only hope that the American public will become outraged enough not to buy a large number of books by these two leeches.

Obama irrational with Muslims: Example, his speech at the Ft. Hood [Massacare] memorial!

The President of the United States of America, Barak Hussein Obama, is a bright, and articulate young man, but a person who seems to lose his objectivity when dealing with his Muslim brethren. Though Barak Obama is a practicing Christian, there is no doubt that his Muslim-birth, and the Islamic environment of his formative years, caused lasting sympathies towards the Muslim people. Being sympathetic to muslims may be a good thing, but doing so with a blind eye to the violent nature of its religious teaching, is dangerous.

In his speech at the memorial to those Americans who were fallen by the American Army Muslim Major Hasan, in Fort Hood, the American President took the occasion to be conciliatory towards Muslims rather than to concentrate on the magnitude of the event, and to admit that Muslims represent more violence than do most other Americans. This is not to say that all non-Muslim American people are violent-free, but it is to say, that in today’s world, based on statistics, Muslims cause more terror acts than all other groups combined.

It is time that the Muslim-born President of the United States, a person who formally adopted Christianity, stood up and admitted to the fact that Islam is a violent religion. It is time that the President, in order to protect the American public (the President’s most important function,) accept the fact that Muslims should, within reasonable bounds, be scrutinized more closely by law-enforcement, than non-Muslims.

The Fort Hood massacre by an American army officer of the Muslim faith, a man who killed in the name of Allah, should have woken President Barak Hussein Obama to the fact that Islam preaches, and in a large way encourages, violence. The American President should, for the moment, forget his Islamic heritage, his Islamic sympathies, Islamic instincts, and Islamic influences, and rise about his emotional ties to admit that Muslims are statistically more dangerous to Americans than non-Muslims.

Only two options for Afghanistan; withdraw, or fully comply with the requests of the military.

Unless Barak Obama decides to pull American troops out of Afghanistan for political reasons, and leave the country to El Qaeda and the Taliban, or listen to his military commanders and commit 40,000+ more troops to the country; he would make a fool of himself.

With no military experience, nor sound judgement on matters of war, for President Obama to commit less troops to Afghanistan than his military commanders on the ground requested, would be an irresponsible and arrogant act that should create a ground-swell of opposition to the young President and his shaky policies.

Withdrawal will be painful, admitting, as the Russians did, that superpowers cannot match religious convictions. On the other hand, tampering with requests from military commanders would simply demonstrate poor judgement, arrogance, and the inexperience that Hillary Clinton spoke of during the primaries, and that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad attributed to President Obama.

Consistent with previous blogs: It may be prudent to profile Muslims.

Muslims are no different from other God’s creatures, but yet those who subscribe to Islam and accept the Koran as the FINAL word from the Divine, represent a “clear and present danger,” to all infidels, including all non-Muslim Americans.

As was recently made clear by the action of United States Major Hasan, Muslims who accept the Koran as the final word of god (Allah in the case of Islam,) are bound to convert infidels to Islam or punish them for failing to do so. Many of those people who knew that Major Hasan was a Muslim activist, but who decided to be politically correct and not report it, might have well contributed to the death of thirteen people in Fort Hood, and will have to live with their conscience for the rest of their lives.

If the United State had a clear policy that calls for bringing to the attention of the powers-to-be any suspicious Muslim activist, the Fort Hood Massacre might have well been avoided; it is time to put political correctness aside and protect the American public from the threat of Islam.

Muslims who are routinely profiled and undergo severe scrutiny at Israeli airports do not seem disturbed by the process; they understand, as should Muslims in America, that the safety of the many, justifies the infringement of some individual rights.

It is time for the United States to realize that many Muslims, even some of whom may appear harmless, as did Major Hasan to many people who met him, represent danger to the general American public, and take appropriate action.

It is time for the United States, under tight controls that will not cause undue indignities to Muslims, to establish a process of profiling Muslims and putting in place a system to reduce, and hopefully eliminate, the danger many Muslims represent to American society.

Obama must stop pressing Netanyahu who has neither Divine, nor popular, authority to give more concessions!

President Barak Hussein Obama push of Netanyahu to give more concession is beyond the Israeli Prime Minister authority, and may result in America causing Israel’s government to be removed, and only be replaced by a more militant body.

Obama’s lack of understanding of Israeli sensitivities, and his pro-Islam stance are widening the chasm he built between the United States ans Israel in the few months since he took office.